ReportsIJRG

International Journal of Global Risks and Governance

Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, GCRI
Licence
CC BY 4.0, open access
Report series
17
Networks
7

Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Academy Capability · Start here

Start here: how this desk of Reports works

Abstract. Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, and Risk Academy writes the desk on capability. If you teach risk, learn it or plan a workforce, this desk reports what competence exists, what is missing and which pathways close the gap.

For
educators, learners and workforce planners
Status
Draft, not yet released

01What Reports is

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, and Risk Academy writes the desk on capability. If you teach risk, learn it or plan a workforce, this desk reports what competence exists, what is missing and which pathways close the gap.

Atlas of the Academy Capability desk: its mandate, the series it leads, the eight chapters of its edition, what to send here and its Zenodo community. The sections below give the same facts as text.
The Academy Capability desk atlas, with its facts written out below.

02This desk: Capability

The Academy reports learning and workforce capability: competencies, completions, practicum outcomes and gaps. It reports in aggregate only and never publishes a learner record.

Mandate: The capability of the workforce that manages the risks in scope: the competencies needed, what learning and practicum show, and where the gaps are. Reported in aggregate only; no learner record is published.

This desk leads no series of its own yet. Its edition is the Consortium’s Capability edition.

03The six desks

Capability is one of six desks, and it deposits to its own Zenodo community under the flagship.

Diagram of the six desks and the flagship Zenodo community nexusreports. The table below lists the desks.
The six desks
DeskEditionZenodo community
GCRISystems Evidencenexusreports-gcri
GRFPublic Deliberationnexusreports-grf
GRACapital Readinessnexusreports-gra
NXSStandards Progressnexusreports-nxs
RACapabilitynexusreports-ra
GRXMeasurementnexusreports-grx

Every record carries a DOI and a full version history.

04The edition in eight chapters, in this desk’s terms

The chapters move from the capability needed to the competency map that a curriculum can use.

The eight chapters of the Capability edition
ChapterTitleWhat it covers
1Capability neededThe competencies the systems in scope require of those who manage them.
2Capability findingsWhat learning, practicum and workforce evidence show, in aggregate, each with its source.
3Faculties and rolesCapability read by faculty and by professional role.
4Gaps and pathwaysThe gaps between capability needed and capability taught, and the learning pathways that address them.
5Workforce scenariosHow workforce needs would change under stated scenarios; conditional, never predictions.
6Readings from the other desksReadings from the other desks: cross-references to their editions for the same scope, not copies of them.
7Curriculum agendaThe courses, pathways and research notes the next cycle takes up.
8Competency mapThe competencies in scope, mapped to roles, faculties and courses.

05How to contribute

Send learning outcomes, competency evidence or practicum results. Send aggregates. Do not send any record that names a learner.

This desk takes:

  • Learning outcomes from a course or programme, in aggregate
  • Competency evidence from a role, a profession or a framework
  • Practicum results, with the brief they answered
  • A gap between the competencies needed and those taught

The gateway page of the Academy Capability desk gives the route.

06The editorial workflow

An educator’s contribution goes through the same review as a research paper. The declared review model tells you in advance who will read it.

Diagram of the editorial workflow in six steps: submit, screen, review, decide, accept, publish, with a revision branch and a decline or appeal branch. The list below gives every step.
The editorial workflow
StepWhat happens
1. SubmitContributor declarations and licence terms are signed first.
2. ScreenEditors check scope, completeness and licensing.
3. ReviewPeer review runs under the model declared at submission. Authors may revise, then the work returns to review.
4. DecideNamed editors decide and record their reasons. Declined work can be appealed through a separate route.
5. AcceptThe decision is recorded and the work moves to production.
6. PublishA named editor publishes. The DOI is issued.

Refusals are written to a hash-chained log: before_window, after_window, wrong_state, agreement_required, passes_missing, approver_is_author. No request carries a time. No capability overrides a gate. Voting is advisory and never moves a submission.

07The sixteen-gate quarterly cycle

Teaching terms and publication cycles rarely line up. Use the submission deadline to decide which term’s outcomes reach which quarter.

Diagram of the sixteen gates of a quarterly cycle, from the call opening to the corrections window closing. The list below gives every gate.
The sixteen gates of a quarterly cycle
OrderGateMeaning
1call_openThe call opens.
2call_closeThe call closes.
3submission_deadlineLast moment to submit into this cycle. Later submissions roll to the next cycle.
4triage_closeIntake triage must be finished.
5review_openThe review window opens.
6reviewer_reminderFirst reminder to reviewers.
7review_closeReviews are due. Overdue reviews escalate and are reassigned.
8decision_dateThe editorial decision is due.
9revision_closeThe revision window ends.
10copyedit_freezeCopyedit and data-check freeze.
11evidence_closeEvidence close.
12production_closeProduction ends.
13release_approvalThe named approver signs the release.
14releaseRelease date. It is the anchor of the cycle.
15deposit_approvalZenodo deposit approval. The deposit stays a draft until then.
16corrections_closeThe corrections window ends.

Cycle codes are 2026-BASELINE, then 2027-Q1 to 2027-Q4. The release date is the only date the owner sets. Until it is set, every gate is unscheduled and every gated step is refused.

08Release control

The accessibility check applies to the edition itself. A course team can reuse the edition because it has passed it.

Diagram of release control: seven checks must pass, the named approver signs, six artefacts are fixed with checksums, the Zenodo deposit stays a draft, then the record is published with a DOI.
  • Check: Peer review passes.
  • Check: Data check.
  • Check: Citation check.
  • Check: Accessibility check.
  • Check: Legal check.
  • Check: Licence and file rules.
  • Check: Approver is not an author.
  • The named approver signs a plan bound to the release digest.
  • Six artefacts are fixed, each with a SHA-256 checksum: edition-pack, web, print, data-bundle, ro-crate, citation-metadata.
  • The Zenodo deposit stays a draft until the deposit approval gate.
  • The record is published with a DOI. A correction is a new version that keeps the concept DOI.

Release approval, deposit approval and publication are separate acts.

09Open licensing

Teaching materials built on an edition can reuse its text under CC BY 4.0. Give credit as the licence requires.

Licence rules

  • Text, figures and maps: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX: CC-BY-4.0).
  • Data: CC0 1.0 (SPDX: CC0-1.0).
  • Code: an OSI-approved licence.
  • Media: CC BY 4.0 or CC0 1.0.
  • No NC, ND or SA licence on our own outputs. No paywall, no embargo on text, no fees.

Shared text. It is the same on every Reports site by design.

10Zenodo community and DOIs

Academy records go to the Academy’s community on Zenodo. It exists and is curated by the Academy desk; nothing is deposited in it yet.

This desk’s community: zenodo.org/communities/nexusreports-ra

  • Flagship community: nexusreports. It exists and holds records today.
  • Every record carries a DOI and a full version history. A correction becomes a new version and keeps the concept DOI.

Shared text. It is the same on every Reports site by design.

11The open science stack, with its honest status

Learners with an ORCID can receive credit for a review. The integrations that are not complete are marked below.

Diagram of the open science stack with the status of each integration. The table below gives every status.
The open science stack and its status
IntegrationWhat it doesStatus
ZenodoDOIs, deposits and versionsBuilt
ORCIDContributor identity and review creditBuilt
RORInstitution identifiersNeeds the id
COAR NotifyInbox for peer review servicesBuilt
OAI-PMHA harvesting endpointBuilt
JATS XMLJournal article markupBuilt
RO-CrateResearch object packagingBuilt
CrossrefAn export, not in useExport only

Free and open routes only. Production deposits stay gated until adoption.

Cite

Reports, Academy Capability, start here [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium.

Review copy. The DOI is issued at deposit. Text under CC BY 4.0.

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

Your role here

What you can do from this page.

  • ReaderCite what you read; every correction is public.Corrections log
  • ContributorSend evidence, data or a correction to this desk.Contribute
  • ReviewerReview for this desk; verified reviews are credited.Become a reviewer
  • Editor, steward or boardQueues, decisions and production are in the workspace.My workspace
Risk Academy

Courses · practice · credentials

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

Risk Academy is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.