01What Reports is
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, and Risk Academy writes the desk on capability. If you teach risk, learn it or plan a workforce, this desk reports what competence exists, what is missing and which pathways close the gap.

02This desk: Capability
The Academy reports learning and workforce capability: competencies, completions, practicum outcomes and gaps. It reports in aggregate only and never publishes a learner record.
Mandate: The capability of the workforce that manages the risks in scope: the competencies needed, what learning and practicum show, and where the gaps are. Reported in aggregate only; no learner record is published.
This desk leads no series of its own yet. Its edition is the Consortium’s Capability edition.
03The six desks
Capability is one of six desks, and it deposits to its own Zenodo community under the flagship.

| Desk | Edition | Zenodo community |
|---|---|---|
| GCRI | Systems Evidence | nexusreports-gcri |
| GRF | Public Deliberation | nexusreports-grf |
| GRA | Capital Readiness | nexusreports-gra |
| NXS | Standards Progress | nexusreports-nxs |
| RA | Capability | nexusreports-ra |
| GRX | Measurement | nexusreports-grx |
04The edition in eight chapters, in this desk’s terms
The chapters move from the capability needed to the competency map that a curriculum can use.
| Chapter | Title | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capability needed | The competencies the systems in scope require of those who manage them. |
| 2 | Capability findings | What learning, practicum and workforce evidence show, in aggregate, each with its source. |
| 3 | Faculties and roles | Capability read by faculty and by professional role. |
| 4 | Gaps and pathways | The gaps between capability needed and capability taught, and the learning pathways that address them. |
| 5 | Workforce scenarios | How workforce needs would change under stated scenarios; conditional, never predictions. |
| 6 | Readings from the other desks | Readings from the other desks: cross-references to their editions for the same scope, not copies of them. |
| 7 | Curriculum agenda | The courses, pathways and research notes the next cycle takes up. |
| 8 | Competency map | The competencies in scope, mapped to roles, faculties and courses. |
05How to contribute
Send learning outcomes, competency evidence or practicum results. Send aggregates. Do not send any record that names a learner.
This desk takes:
- Learning outcomes from a course or programme, in aggregate
- Competency evidence from a role, a profession or a framework
- Practicum results, with the brief they answered
- A gap between the competencies needed and those taught
The gateway page of the Academy Capability desk gives the route.
06The editorial workflow
An educator’s contribution goes through the same review as a research paper. The declared review model tells you in advance who will read it.

| Step | What happens |
|---|---|
| 1. Submit | Contributor declarations and licence terms are signed first. |
| 2. Screen | Editors check scope, completeness and licensing. |
| 3. Review | Peer review runs under the model declared at submission. Authors may revise, then the work returns to review. |
| 4. Decide | Named editors decide and record their reasons. Declined work can be appealed through a separate route. |
| 5. Accept | The decision is recorded and the work moves to production. |
| 6. Publish | A named editor publishes. The DOI is issued. |
07The sixteen-gate quarterly cycle
Teaching terms and publication cycles rarely line up. Use the submission deadline to decide which term’s outcomes reach which quarter.

| Order | Gate | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | call_open | The call opens. |
| 2 | call_close | The call closes. |
| 3 | submission_deadline | Last moment to submit into this cycle. Later submissions roll to the next cycle. |
| 4 | triage_close | Intake triage must be finished. |
| 5 | review_open | The review window opens. |
| 6 | reviewer_reminder | First reminder to reviewers. |
| 7 | review_close | Reviews are due. Overdue reviews escalate and are reassigned. |
| 8 | decision_date | The editorial decision is due. |
| 9 | revision_close | The revision window ends. |
| 10 | copyedit_freeze | Copyedit and data-check freeze. |
| 11 | evidence_close | Evidence close. |
| 12 | production_close | Production ends. |
| 13 | release_approval | The named approver signs the release. |
| 14 | release | Release date. It is the anchor of the cycle. |
| 15 | deposit_approval | Zenodo deposit approval. The deposit stays a draft until then. |
| 16 | corrections_close | The corrections window ends. |
08Release control
The accessibility check applies to the edition itself. A course team can reuse the edition because it has passed it.

- Check: Peer review passes.
- Check: Data check.
- Check: Citation check.
- Check: Accessibility check.
- Check: Legal check.
- Check: Licence and file rules.
- Check: Approver is not an author.
- The named approver signs a plan bound to the release digest.
- Six artefacts are fixed, each with a SHA-256 checksum: edition-pack, web, print, data-bundle, ro-crate, citation-metadata.
- The Zenodo deposit stays a draft until the deposit approval gate.
- The record is published with a DOI. A correction is a new version that keeps the concept DOI.
09Open licensing
Teaching materials built on an edition can reuse its text under CC BY 4.0. Give credit as the licence requires.
Licence rules
- Text, figures and maps: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX: CC-BY-4.0).
- Data: CC0 1.0 (SPDX: CC0-1.0).
- Code: an OSI-approved licence.
- Media: CC BY 4.0 or CC0 1.0.
- No NC, ND or SA licence on our own outputs. No paywall, no embargo on text, no fees.
10Zenodo community and DOIs
Academy records go to the Academy’s community on Zenodo. It exists and is curated by the Academy desk; nothing is deposited in it yet.
This desk’s community: zenodo.org/communities/nexusreports-ra
- Flagship community: nexusreports. It exists and holds records today.
- Every record carries a DOI and a full version history. A correction becomes a new version and keeps the concept DOI.
11The open science stack, with its honest status
Learners with an ORCID can receive credit for a review. The integrations that are not complete are marked below.

| Integration | What it does | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Zenodo | DOIs, deposits and versions | Built |
| ORCID | Contributor identity and review credit | Built |
| ROR | Institution identifiers | Needs the id |
| COAR Notify | Inbox for peer review services | Built |
| OAI-PMH | A harvesting endpoint | Built |
| JATS XML | Journal article markup | Built |
| RO-Crate | Research object packaging | Built |
| Crossref | An export, not in use | Export only |
Cite
Reports, Academy Capability, start here [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium.
