- Capability: Food and Agrifood Systems 2026
- Chapter 6 · Readings
Readings from the other desks
Readings from the other desks: cross-references to their editions for the same scope, not copies of them.
6.1Literature and evidence review: the Risk Academy reading in the GCRI edition
The review protocol behind Global Food 2026, as printed in the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence edition. The review behind this edition covers food assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.
- Question
- What does the published evidence establish about the world’s food and agrifood systems and its couplings?
- Sources searched
- agency flagships; statistical releases; peer-reviewed crop, climate and food-system literature; regulator texts
- Window
- releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
- Selection
- sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
- Next step
- systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
6.2Readings from the other desks
Cross-references to the other desks’ editions for the same subject, never copies of them.
| Desk | Edition | State | Identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Academy Capability | Capability: Food and Agrifood Systems 2026 | In preparation | NR-RA-GS-03-2026-BASELINE (reserved) |
| GCRI Systems Evidence | Systems Evidence: Food and Agrifood Systems 2026 | Drafted, in stewardship review | NR-SECTOR-FOOD-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0 |
| GRF Public Deliberation | Outside this desk’s remit | Not in remit | |
| GRA Capital Readiness | Capital Readiness: Food and Agrifood Systems 2026 | In preparation | NR-GRA-GS-03-2026-BASELINE (reserved) |
| Standards Progress | Standards Progress: Food and Agrifood Systems 2026 | In preparation | NR-NXS-GS-03-2026-BASELINE (reserved) |
| Index Measurement | Outside this desk’s remit | Not in remit |
6.3Contribute to this chapter
The capability of the workforce that manages the risks in scope: the competencies needed, what learning and practicum show, and where the gaps are. Reported in aggregate only; no learner record is published. Material for this chapter goes to the Academy Capability desk; what belongs to another desk is forwarded, not refused.
Risk Academy reads an edition for capability: what competence exists, what is missing, which pathway closes the gap and which role needs it.
If you teach or assess risk, send aggregate outcomes and the method behind them. The Academy will not accept a file that names a learner.
